I Hate Streaming Media Because the Cloud Sucks

Today TechCrunch broke a story on the launch of MOG, an online subscription-based streaming music site similar to Pandora/Rhapsody/Napster etc. MOG is a cool service with tons of potential. It boasts a great interface and excellent sound quality, and I highly recommend signing up for a 1 hour trial. I was very excited to try it out, but after using the service for a few minutes I remembered something…I hate streaming media. I refuse to move my music library to the cloud for one reason- the cloud sucks. 

Can you tell me what the problem is with the picture below?

Only 5 of 12 songs are available for Deerhunter's "Cryptograms" album. The title track is unavailable for Pete's sake. I'm not going to post the results of my Fugazi search (hint: zero). And this is why I hate streaming media: the price of instant access is limited selection. 

I don't mean to pick on MOG. I like their service better than Pandora or Last.FM. Go check out the selection of movies on Hulu or NetFlix Instant Queue. Go ahead, I'll wait…Yeah, pretty bad huh? It's like the damn $5 DVD bin at Walmart.

I will gladly pay a subscription fee for online streaming media. I'll let go of my racks of CDs and drives filled with MP3s and move everything to the cloud. But not as long as the cloud is filled with partial albums and crap movies.

Posted via email from I/O: Tech Introvert

Customer Support via Twitter Actually Works

I’ve openly bitched about products + services on Twitter at least 4 or 5 times. In every case, someone from that company has contacted me to provide an explanation or offer assistance within 24 hours. In fact with many products/services you can send tweets directly to the support staff, developers, or even the executives + creators. And get responses quickly.

That’s an unprecedented level of user accessibility.

Posted via email from I/O: Tech Introvert

Live Music Friday: Warpaint, Explosions in the Sky

Warpaint – Krimson

Explosions in the Sky – Birth and Death of the Day

Tech Questions to Baffle Your Under-30 Friends

With a heavy dose of nostalgia, and a light dash of pretentiousness, here's a list of tech questions which are virtually unanswerable by those under the age of 30. 

Feel free to add your own! 

• What are the notches on a 5 1/4 floppy for? Why are there sometimes two?
• What is a CD-ROM caddy?
• What does a cassette tape backup sound like?
• What was so unusual about CompuServe email addresses?
• What does GOSUB do?
• What types of files were commonly uuencoded/uudecoded?
• What is Archie used for?
• What did Hayes Microcomputer Products make?
• What was Progman.exe used for? What was it replaced by?

Posted via email from I/O: Tech Introvert

The Next Android Phone

Manufacturers are realizing that slapping Android on their devices is a sure fire way to bump up the buzz/interest/geek cred of their devices- no matter how lame and uninteresting the hardware was before Android.

Photo thanks to The Gunslinger: http://tsutpen.blogspot.com/2009/11/future-is-now-10.html

Posted via email from I/O: Tech Introvert

Kindle for PC: Almost Useful

Today Amazon announced the release of Kindle for PC, a PC-based version of their eBook reader (Mac version soon to follow). The reader itself is very Acrobat Reader-esque, easy to use, and synced with your Amazon account (no Kindle necessary). It displays an uneditable/unselectable version of the books in your library and allows you to adjust font + page size.

I don't actually use a Kindle. I've read books on my iPhone and actually like it, so I've been considering buying more. One thing has held me back though- some books just don't work on a phone. Programming books, for one, aren't the greatest. It's tough to scroll through lines of code on a tiny iPhone screen. I thought Kindle for PC would help solve this problem, and I could pop open my laptop (or eventually MacBook) if I wanted a richer reading experience. Unfortunately, Kindle for PC is very bare bones at the present time. It works…but that's about it. Which is actually pretty disappointing. 

Three things that cripple the app-

1) While you can view notes/highlights, you can't actually create notes on your PC. This is listed as a known feature request on Amazon, and I hope they get to it quickly. Also, now is the prefect time to address the ability to export notes. This is a must-have for the Kindle platform.

2) Can't adjust background color. On the iPhone I have options other than the standard retina-burning white page w/black text. Not so on Kindle for PC.

3) Cannot select/copy/paste. This is a huge limitation with Kindle's DRM and has no quick fix. How cool would it be to be able to copy/paste a code example directly into you IDE? Since enabling that would also allow you to copy/paste it into a PDF and sell it for $5, this will never happen. Worse, you can't even copy a word or group of words and Google them, or save a neat little quote for personal inspiration.

I love the Kindle, I love the ebook selection & 1-click purchasing on Amazon, and the cloud-based library. But when the DRM rears it's ugly head, it's enough to make you look into other options like Safari books.

Posted via email from I/O: Tech Introvert

Cadmus Groups Duplicate Tweets, Actually Works

Louis Grey posted about Cadmus earlier today, and the idea of grouping duplicate tweets to remove noise is a great one. 

Better yet, it actually seems to work. For Tweets anyway. Cadmus also supports FriendFeed and RSS, but I haven't had luck with RSS yet. I had some odd results importing my 150-ish subscription Google Reader OPML. It pulled in thousands of old items in no discernible order. But it did group 30% of them…

Here's Cadmus in action, grabbing 8 posts regarding Google's acquisition of Gizmo5 and rolling them into a single nested tweet. By clicking "Related Posts", you expand the grouped duplicates. Now THAT is cool.

Posted via email from I/O: Tech Introvert

How Do You Sleep at Night, Comcast?

Apparently on a huge pile of money…

Posted via email from I/O: Tech Introvert

Note to Self- Avoid Financial Times

Nice. Forced registration is a great way to guarantee most readers will get their news elsewhere. I don’t care if it’s free, it’s yet another login and extra steps I don’t want/need.

Posted via email from I/O: Tech Introvert

So Ends My Yearly Affair with Netflix

Over the past 5 years or so, I've signed up and cancelled my Netflix account 3 times. It's usually been for the same basic reason- I just don't watch DVDs very often. I want to, but it never really pans out that way. There is just too much other stuff in my life to do/read/watch/play. But this time I was sucked in by another emerging phenomenon- online streaming. The ability to fire up any movie or TV show on my laptop, Xbox360 or networked DVD player it's exactly what I've been wanting for years. So I was pretty psyched when I signed up a few months ago. Initially I was not disappointed; Netflix has done a great job with its online streaming. It works incredibly well. But after spending some time flipping through movies, i noticed a disturbing trend. There was nothing I wanted to watch.

I'd say 75% of the content I wanted to see was not available to stream online (DVD only). Netflix does a great job getting DVDs out within a day or two, but that's not my style. I want to click and watch. If I realize my judgement was clouded by nostalgia and Emergency! is really a dumb show, I want to be able to change my mind without a 3-day mail swap. That's what “Instant” means, and that's what I thought Netflix “Watch Instantly” should mean.

In all fairness to Netflix, we've still got a ways to go before the dream of “watch anything instantly” comes true. The frustrating thing is the technology and demand are there, but something (copyright law? legal red tape? pure greed?) is keeping the content locked up. Services like Hulu and YouTube are trying, but even they suffer from the same problems. They typically offer only crappy movies and a limited number of TV shows that people actually want to see. Example- Season 1 of 21 Jump Street is on Hulu, but Mad Men is not. The selection improves on the non-subscription side as Amazon and iTunes have a much better selection, but the cost is prohibitively expensive. $60 for a season pass to The Office? That's 1 season (20-ish episodes) of 1 program? Are you out of your mind? This causes everyone but only the most hardcore fans to put their wallets away.

I still have hope for Netflix. Subscription services are the future as horrifically expensive pay-per-view dies a slow death. Networks + movie studios are beginning to understand this, so it's just a matter of time. Maybe next year.

Posted via email from I/O: Tech Introvert